eNewsletterFacebookTwitterGoogle+TumblrMac’s BlogYouTubeVideo Mailbox
U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry
U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry
 

Dear Friend,

The greatest threat to our national security is not from Al Qaeda or Iran; rather, it stems from the limits we put on ourselves. 

For example, unless Congress takes action, sequestration — automatic spending cuts mandated in the Budget Control Act to reduce the deficit — will begin in six short months.  Of the $1.2 trillion in total cuts, half will come from domestic programs and the other half from defense.  There is widespread and bipartisan agreement that these cuts will devastate America’s national security and further harm the economy.

We must address our spending and debt problem and we also must protect the country.  However, haphazard, across-the-board cuts to defense — on top of the nearly half-trillion dollars ($487 billion) in cuts already being implemented— are a thoughtless, short-sighted solution to our bigger structural spending problems.

Defense is the first job of the federal government, and I think the first money the federal government spends should be for national security. While it makes up only 19 percent of the federal budget, 50 percent of deficit reductions will come from defense.

The dramatic effects of sequestration do not end with the military.  Many domestic programs will face similar, across-the-board reductions.   Already, the economic consequences stemming from the automatic cuts have begun with employers scaling back or halting hiring, reducing inventory, and preparing for layoffs.  The results will grow worse as January draws closer.

In order to avoid the disastrous effects of sequestration while still cutting billions in spending and reducing the deficit, the House of Representatives has taken several steps.  In May, the House passed the Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act of 2012.  The legislation would provide mandatory spending reductions in order to replace automatic cuts to discretionary spending (primarily from defense accounts) in 2013 and to also reduce the deficit.  The savings were produced by six separate House committees and include changes ranging from repealing parts of Obamacare to terminating housing bailouts and requiring a Social Security number to claim the refundable child tax credit.

In addition to the Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act, next week the House will consider the Sequestration Transparency Act of 2012. The bill would require the administration to submit to Congress a detailed preview of the sequestration required by the Budget Control Act. We may also consider the Down Payment to Protect National Security Act (H.R. 3662), a bill which I am co-sponsoring.  This proposal offsets the first year of sequestration by requiring a government wide reduction in the number of federal employees by 10 percent through attrition.  It would deliver $127 billion in federal government savings, which is more than what is required under sequestration.  If signed into law, Congress would have a year to find reasonable and responsible cuts to the deficit – cuts that would not cripple our military capabilities, reduce our GDP, or increase national unemployment.

I am also helping lead multiple efforts to push President Obama, the Secretary of Defense, military leaders, and Administration officials to share their plans for dealing with sequestration and to urge them to consider working with the House on alternatives.

With our high unemployment rate and weak job creation, it is clear that our economy cannot sustain the significant, negative impacts of automatic cuts without falling back into recession.  There is a more responsible way to reduce our deficit without creating such a mess in the private sector. Furthermore, waiting until the lame duck session of Congress is unwise, given the full agenda that Congress faces. 

The House is leading the way with its budget and other policy alternatives to avoiding arbitrary, across-the-board cuts.  It is time for the Senate and the President to do something as well.

Sincerely,


Videos on Sequestration

The Human Consequences of Defense Cuts

Congressman Thornberry talks impact of possible defense cuts locally 

Congressman Thornberry speaks with Neil Cavuto on Fox Business

Congressman Thornberry's statement on sequestration at House Armed Services press conference

Congressman Thornberry questions Joint Chiefs of Staff at  sequestration hearing

 CBS News: Republicans say defense cuts should not be part of super-committee plan

Statements and Articles on Sequestration

ROLL CALL: Thornberry--The Best Defense Starts with a Good Offense

Roll Call: Reject the meat axe approach

A letter to Senator Harry Reid from the House Committee on Armed Services

Thornberry responds to President's Defense Strategy Rollout

New York Times: Calls to Limit Cuts to Pentagon

Reports on Sequestration

House Armed Services Committee Impact Memo - Executive Summary

House Armed Services Committee fact Sheet

National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) - Executive Summary

Center for Security Policy State-by-State Impact Reports

Deloitte Report on the U.S. Aerospace and Defense Industry

 

Join Mac's Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/repmacthornberry?sk=wall 

*Please note, this email was sent from an unattended mailbox.*  

eNewsletterFacebookTwitterGoogle+TumblrMac's BlogYouTubeVideo Mailbox

AMARILLO OFFICE
905 South Fillmore Street, Suite 520
Amarillo, Texas 79101
T (806) 371-8844
F (806) 371-7044
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2209 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
T (202) 225-3706
F (202) 225-3486
WICHITA FALLS OFFICE
4245 Kemp, Suite 506
Wichita Falls, Texas 76308
T (940) 692-1700
F (940) 692-0539
UPDATE SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US
Visit my Website Forward to a Friend Share on Facebook